This is the documentation for Cloudera Impala 1.4.1.
Documentation for other versions is available at Cloudera.com.

Using the Parquet File Format with Impala Tables

Impala helps you to create, manage, and query Parquet tables. Parquet is a column-oriented binary file format intended to be highly efficient for the types of large-scale queries that Impala is best at. Parquet is especially good for queries scanning particular columns within a table, for example to query "wide" tables with many columns, or to perform aggregation operations such as SUM() and AVG() that need to process most or all of the values from a column. Each data file contains the values for a set of rows (the "row group"). Within a data file, the values from each column are organized so that they are all adjacent, enabling good compression for the values from that column. Queries against a Parquet table can retrieve and analyze these values from any column quickly and with minimal I/O.

Table 1. Parquet Format Support in Impala
File Type Format Compression Codecs Impala Can CREATE? Impala Can INSERT?
Parquet Structured Snappy, GZIP; currently Snappy by default Yes. Yes: CREATE TABLE, INSERT, and query.

Continue reading:

Creating Parquet Tables in Impala

To create a table named PARQUET_TABLE that uses the Parquet format, you would use a command like the following, substituting your own table name, column names, and data types:

[impala-host:21000] > create table parquet_table_name (x INT, y STRING) STORED AS PARQUET;

Or, to clone the column names and data types of an existing table:

[impala-host:21000] > create table parquet_table_name LIKE other_table_name STORED AS PARQUET;

In Impala 1.4.0 and higher, you can derive column definitions from a raw Parquet data file, even without an existing Impala table. For example, you can create an external table pointing to an HDFS directory, and base the column definitions on one of the files in that directory:

CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE ingest_existing_files LIKE PARQUET '/user/etl/destination/datafile1.dat'
  LOCATION '/user/etl/destination'
  STORED AS PARQUET;

Or, you can refer to an existing data file and create a new empty table with suitable column definitions. Then you can use INSERT to create new data files or LOAD DATA to transfer existing data files into the new table.

CREATE TABLE columns_from_data_file LIKE PARQUET '/user/etl/destination/datafile1.dat'
  STORED AS PARQUET;

In this example, the new table is partitioned by year, month, and day. These partition key columns are not part of the data file, so you specify them in the CREATE TABLE statement:

CREATE TABLE columns_from_data_file LIKE PARQUET '/user/etl/destination/datafile1.dat'
  PARTITION (year INT, month TINYINT, day TINYINT)
  STORED AS PARQUET;

See CREATE TABLE Statement for more details about the CREATE TABLE LIKE PARQUET syntax.

Once you have created a table, to insert data into that table, use a command similar to the following, again with your own table names:

[impala-host:21000] > insert overwrite table parquet_table_name select * from other_table_name;

If the Parquet table has a different number of columns or different column names than the other table, specify the names of columns from the other table rather than * in the SELECT statement.

Loading Data into Parquet Tables

Choose from the following techniques for loading data into Parquet tables, depending on whether the original data is already in an Impala table, or exists as raw data files outside Impala.

If you already have data in an Impala or Hive table, perhaps in a different file format or partitioning scheme, you can transfer the data to a Parquet table using the Impala INSERT...SELECT syntax. You can convert, filter, repartition, and do other things to the data as part of this same INSERT statement. See Snappy and GZip Compression for Parquet Data Files for some examples showing how to insert data into Parquet tables.

When inserting into partitioned tables, especially using the Parquet file format, you can include a hint in the INSERT statement to fine-tune the overall performance of the operation and its resource usage:
  • These hints are available in Impala 1.2.2 and higher.
  • You would only use these hints if an INSERT into a partitioned Parquet table was failing due to capacity limits, or if such an INSERT was succeeding but with less-than-optimal performance.
  • To use these hints, put the hint keyword [SHUFFLE] or [NOSHUFFLE] (including the square brackets) after the PARTITION clause, immediately before the SELECT keyword.
  • [SHUFFLE] selects an execution plan that minimizes the number of files being written simultaneously to HDFS, and the number of 1 GB memory buffers holding data for individual partitions. Thus it reduces overall resource usage for the INSERT operation, allowing some INSERT operations to succeed that otherwise would fail. It does involve some data transfer between the nodes so that the data files for a particular partition are all constructed on the same node.
  • [NOSHUFFLE] selects an execution plan that might be faster overall, but might also produce a larger number of small data files or exceed capacity limits, causing the INSERT operation to fail. Use [SHUFFLE] in cases where an INSERT statement fails or runs inefficiently due to all nodes attempting to construct data for all partitions.
  • Impala automatically uses the [SHUFFLE] method if any partition key column in the source table, mentioned in the INSERT ... SELECT query, does not have column statistics. In this case, only the [NOSHUFFLE] hint would have any effect.
  • If column statistics are available for all partition key columns in the source table mentioned in the INSERT ... SELECT query, Impala chooses whether to use the [SHUFFLE] or [NOSHUFFLE] technique based on the estimated number of distinct values in those columns and the number of nodes involved in the INSERT operation. In this case, you might need the [SHUFFLE] or the [NOSHUFFLE] hint to override the execution plan selected by Impala.

Any INSERT statement for a Parquet table requires enough free space in the HDFS filesystem to write one block. Because Parquet data files use a block size of 1 GB by default, an INSERT might fail (even for a very small amount of data) if your HDFS is running low on space.

Avoid the INSERT...VALUES syntax for Parquet tables, because INSERT...VALUES produces a separate tiny data file for each INSERT...VALUES statement, and the strength of Parquet is in its handling of data (compressing, parallelizing, and so on) in 1 GB chunks.

If you have one or more Parquet data files produced outside of Impala, you can quickly make the data queryable through Impala by one of the following methods:

  • The LOAD DATA statement moves a single data file or a directory full of data files into the data directory for an Impala table. It does no validation or conversion of the data. The original data files must be somewhere in HDFS, not the local filesystem.
  • The CREATE TABLE statement with the LOCATION clause creates a table where the data continues to reside outside the Impala data directory. The original data files must be somewhere in HDFS, not the local filesystem. For extra safety, if the data is intended to be long-lived and reused by other applications, you can use the CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE syntax so that the data files are not deleted by an Impala DROP TABLE statement.
  • If the Parquet table already exists, you can copy Parquet data files directly into it, then use the REFRESH statement to make Impala recognize the newly added data. Remember to preserve the 1 GB block size of the Parquet data files by using the hdfs distcp -pb command rather than a -put or -cp operation on the Parquet files. See Example of Copying Parquet Data Files for an example of this kind of operation.

If the data exists outside Impala and is in some other format, combine both of the preceding techniques. First, use a LOAD DATA or CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE ... LOCATION statement to bring the data into an Impala table that uses the appropriate file format. Then, use an INSERT...SELECT statement to copy the data to the Parquet table, converting to Parquet format as part of the process.

Loading data into Parquet tables is a memory-intensive operation, because the incoming data is buffered until it reaches 1 GB in size, then that chunk of data is organized and compressed in memory before being written out. The memory consumption can be larger when inserting data into partitioned Parquet tables, because a separate data file is written for each combination of partition key column values, potentially requiring several 1 GB chunks to be manipulated in memory at once.

When inserting into a partitioned Parquet table, Impala redistributes the data among the nodes to reduce memory consumption. You might still need to temporarily increase the memory dedicated to Impala during the insert operation, or break up the load operation into several INSERT statements, or both.

  Note: All the preceding techniques assume that the data you are loading matches the structure of the destination table, including column order, column names, and partition layout. To transform or reorganize the data, start by loading the data into a Parquet table that matches the underlying structure of the data, then use one of the table-copying techniques such as CREATE TABLE AS SELECT or INSERT ... SELECT to reorder or rename columns, divide the data among multiple partitions, and so on. For example to take a single comprehensive Parquet data file and load it into a partitioned table, you would use an INSERT ... SELECT statement with dynamic partitioning to let Impala create separate data files with the appropriate partition values; for an example, see INSERT Statement.

Query Performance for Impala Parquet Tables

Query performance for Parquet tables depends on the number of columns needed to process the SELECT list and WHERE clauses of the query, the way data is divided into 1 GB data files ("row groups"), the reduction in I/O by reading the data for each column in compressed format, which data files can be skipped (for partitioned tables), and the CPU overhead of decompressing the data for each column.

For example, the following is an efficient query for a Parquet table:
select avg(income) from census_data where state = 'CA';
The query processes only 2 columns out of a large number of total columns. If the table is partitioned by the STATE column, it is even more efficient because the query only has to read and decode 1 column from each data file, and it can read only the data files in the partition directory for the state 'CA', skipping the data files for all the other states, which will be physically located in other directories.
The following is a relatively inefficient query for a Parquet table:
select * from census_data;
Impala would have to read the entire contents of each 1 GB data file, and decompress the contents of each column for each row group, negating the I/O optimizations of the column-oriented format. This query might still be faster for a Parquet table than a table with some other file format, but it does not take advantage of the unique strengths of Parquet data files.

Impala can optimize queries on Parquet tables, especially join queries, better when statistics are available for all the tables. Issue the COMPUTE STATS statement for each table after substantial amounts of data are loaded into or appended to it. See COMPUTE STATS Statement for details.

  Note: Currently, a known issue (IMPALA-488) could cause excessive memory usage during a COMPUTE STATS operation on a Parquet table. As a workaround, issue the command SET NUM_SCANNER_THREADS=2 in impala-shell before issuing the COMPUTE STATS statement. Then issue UNSET NUM_SCANNER_THREADS before continuing with queries.

Partitioning for Parquet Tables

As explained in Partitioning, partitioning is an important performance technique for Impala generally. This section explains some of the performance considerations for partitioned Parquet tables.

The Parquet file format is ideal for tables containing many columns, where most queries only refer to a small subset of the columns. As explained in How Parquet Data Files Are Organized, the physical layout of Parquet data files lets Impala read only a small fraction of the data for many queries. The performance benefits of this approach are amplified when you use Parquet tables in combination with partitioning. Impala can skip the data files for certain partitions entirely, based on the comparisons in the WHERE clause that refer to the partition key columns. For example, queries on partitioned tables often analyze data for time intervals based on columns such as YEAR, MONTH, and/or DAY, or for geographic regions. Remember that Parquet data files use a 1 GB block size, so when deciding how finely to partition the data, try to find a granularity where each partition contains 1 GB or more of data, rather than creating a large number of smaller files split among many partitions.

Inserting into a partitioned Parquet table can be a resource-intensive operation, because each Impala node could potentially be writing a separate data file to HDFS for each combination of different values for the partition key columns. The large number of simultaneous open files could exceed the HDFS "transceivers" limit. To avoid exceeding this limit, consider the following techniques:

  • Load different subsets of data using separate INSERT statements with specific values for the PARTITION clause, such as PARTITION (year=2010).
  • Increase the "transceivers" value for HDFS, sometimes spelled "xcievers" (sic). The property value in the hdfs-site.xml configuration file is dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads. For example, if you were loading 12 years of data partitioned by year, month, and day, even a value of 4096 might not be high enough. This blog post explores the considerations for setting this value higher or lower, using HBase examples for illustration.
  • Use the COMPUTE STATS statement to collect column statistics on the source table from which data is being copied, so that the Impala query can estimate the number of different values in the partition key columns and distribute the work accordingly.
  Note: Currently, a known issue (IMPALA-488) could cause excessive memory usage during a COMPUTE STATS operation on a Parquet table. As a workaround, issue the command SET NUM_SCANNER_THREADS=2 in impala-shell before issuing the COMPUTE STATS statement. Then issue UNSET NUM_SCANNER_THREADS before continuing with queries.

Snappy and GZip Compression for Parquet Data Files

When Impala writes Parquet data files using the INSERT statement, the underlying compression is controlled by the PARQUET_COMPRESSION_CODEC query option. The allowed values for this query option are snappy (the default), gzip, and none. The option value is not case-sensitive. If the option is set to an unrecognized value, all kinds of queries will fail due to the invalid option setting, not just queries involving Parquet tables.

Example of Parquet Table with Snappy Compression

By default, the underlying data files for a Parquet table are compressed with Snappy. The combination of fast compression and decompression makes it a good choice for many data sets. To ensure Snappy compression is used, for example after experimenting with other compression codecs, set the PARQUET_COMPRESSION_CODEC query option to snappy before inserting the data:

[localhost:21000] > create database parquet_compression;
[localhost:21000] > use parquet_compression;
[localhost:21000] > create table parquet_snappy like raw_text_data;
[localhost:21000] > set PARQUET_COMPRESSION_CODEC=snappy;
[localhost:21000] > insert into parquet_snappy select * from raw_text_data;
Inserted 1000000000 rows in 181.98s

Example of Parquet Table with GZip Compression

If you need more intensive compression (at the expense of more CPU cycles for uncompressing during queries), set the PARQUET_COMPRESSION_CODEC query option to gzip before inserting the data:

[localhost:21000] > create table parquet_gzip like raw_text_data;
[localhost:21000] > set PARQUET_COMPRESSION_CODEC=gzip;
[localhost:21000] > insert into parquet_gzip select * from raw_text_data;
Inserted 1000000000 rows in 1418.24s

Example of Uncompressed Parquet Table

If your data compresses very poorly, or you want to avoid the CPU overhead of compression and decompression entirely, set the PARQUET_COMPRESSION_CODEC query option to none before inserting the data:

[localhost:21000] > create table parquet_none like raw_text_data;
[localhost:21000] > insert into parquet_none select * from raw_text_data;
Inserted 1000000000 rows in 146.90s

Examples of Sizes and Speeds for Compressed Parquet Tables

Here are some examples showing differences in data sizes and query speeds for 1 billion rows of synthetic data, compressed with each kind of codec. As always, run similar tests with realistic data sets of your own. The actual compression ratios, and relative insert and query speeds, will vary depending on the characteristics of the actual data.

In this case, switching from Snappy to GZip compression shrinks the data by an additional 40% or so, while switching from Snappy compression to no compression expands the data also by about 40%:

$ hdfs dfs -du -h /user/hive/warehouse/parquet_compression.db
23.1 G  /user/hive/warehouse/parquet_compression.db/parquet_snappy
13.5 G  /user/hive/warehouse/parquet_compression.db/parquet_gzip
32.8 G  /user/hive/warehouse/parquet_compression.db/parquet_none

Because Parquet data files are typically sized at about 1 GB, each directory will have a different number of data files and the row groups will be arranged differently.

At the same time, the less agressive the compression, the faster the data can be decompressed. In this case using a table with a billion rows, a query that evaluates all the values for a particular column runs faster with no compression than with Snappy compression, and faster with Snappy compression than with Gzip compression. Query performance depends on several other factors, so as always, run your own benchmarks with your own data to determine the ideal tradeoff between data size, CPU efficiency, and speed of insert and query operations.

[localhost:21000] > desc parquet_snappy;
Query finished, fetching results ...
+-----------+---------+---------+
| name      | type    | comment |
+-----------+---------+---------+
| id        | int     |         |
| val       | int     |         |
| zfill     | string  |         |
| name      | string  |         |
| assertion | boolean |         |
+-----------+---------+---------+
Returned 5 row(s) in 0.14s
[localhost:21000] > select avg(val) from parquet_snappy;
Query finished, fetching results ...
+-----------------+
| _c0             |
+-----------------+
| 250000.93577915 |
+-----------------+
Returned 1 row(s) in 4.29s
[localhost:21000] > select avg(val) from parquet_gzip;
Query finished, fetching results ...
+-----------------+
| _c0             |
+-----------------+
| 250000.93577915 |
+-----------------+
Returned 1 row(s) in 6.97s
[localhost:21000] > select avg(val) from parquet_none;
Query finished, fetching results ...
+-----------------+
| _c0             |
+-----------------+
| 250000.93577915 |
+-----------------+
Returned 1 row(s) in 3.67s

Example of Copying Parquet Data Files

Here is a final example, to illustrate how the data files using the various compression codecs are all compatible with each other for read operations. The metadata about the compression format is written into each data file, and can be decoded during queries regardless of the PARQUET_COMPRESSION_CODEC setting in effect at the time. In this example, we copy data files from the PARQUET_SNAPPY, PARQUET_GZIP, and PARQUET_NONE tables used in the previous examples, each containing 1 billion rows, all to the data directory of a new table PARQUET_EVERYTHING. A couple of sample queries demonstrate that the new table now contains 3 billion rows featuring a variety of compression codecs for the data files.

First, we create the table in Impala so that there is a destination directory in HDFS to put the data files:

[localhost:21000] > create table parquet_everything like parquet_snappy;
Query: create table parquet_everything like parquet_snappy

Then in the shell, we copy the relevant data files into the data directory for this new table. Rather than using hdfs dfs -cp as with typical files, we use hdfs distcp -pb to ensure that the special 1 GB block size of the Parquet data files is preserved.

$ hdfs distcp -pb /user/hive/warehouse/parquet_compression.db/parquet_snappy \
  /user/hive/warehouse/parquet_compression.db/parquet_everything
...MapReduce output...
$ hdfs distcp -pb /user/hive/warehouse/parquet_compression.db/parquet_gzip  \
  /user/hive/warehouse/parquet_compression.db/parquet_everything
...MapReduce output...
$ hdfs distcp -pb /user/hive/warehouse/parquet_compression.db/parquet_none  \
  /user/hive/warehouse/parquet_compression.db/parquet_everything
...MapReduce output...

Back in the impala-shell interpreter, we use the REFRESH statement to alert the Impala server to the new data files for this table, then we can run queries demonstrating that the data files represent 3 billion rows, and the values for one of the numeric columns match what was in the original smaller tables:

[localhost:21000] > refresh parquet_everything;
Query finished, fetching results ...

Returned 0 row(s) in 0.32s
[localhost:21000] > select count(*) from parquet_everything;
Query finished, fetching results ...
+------------+
| _c0        |
+------------+
| 3000000000 |
+------------+
Returned 1 row(s) in 8.18s
[localhost:21000] > select avg(val) from parquet_everything;
Query finished, fetching results ...
+-----------------+
| _c0             |
+-----------------+
| 250000.93577915 |
+-----------------+
Returned 1 row(s) in 13.35s

Exchanging Parquet Data Files with Other Hadoop Components

Starting in CDH 4.5, you can read and write Parquet data files from Hive, Pig, and MapReduce. See the CDH 4 Installation Guide for details.

Previously, it was not possible to create Parquet data through Impala and reuse that table within Hive. Now that Parquet support is available for Hive in CDH 4.5, reusing existing Impala Parquet data files in Hive requires updating the table metadata. Use the following command if you are already running Impala 1.1.1 or higher:

ALTER TABLE table_name SET FILEFORMAT PARQUET;

If you are running a level of Impala that is older than 1.1.1, do the metadata update through Hive:

ALTER TABLE table_name SET SERDE 'parquet.hive.serde.ParquetHiveSerDe';
ALTER TABLE table_name SET FILEFORMAT
  INPUTFORMAT "parquet.hive.DeprecatedParquetInputFormat"
  OUTPUTFORMAT "parquet.hive.DeprecatedParquetOutputFormat";

Impala 1.1.1 and higher can reuse Parquet data files created by Hive, without any action required.

Impala supports the scalar data types that you can encode in a Parquet data file, but not composite or nested types such as maps or arrays. If any column of a table uses such an unsupported data type, Impala cannot access that table.

If you copy Parquet data files between nodes, or even between different directories on the same node, make sure to preserve the block size by using the command hadoop distcp -pb. To verify that the block size was preserved, issue the command hdfs fsck -blocks HDFS_path_of_impala_table_dir and check that the average block size is at or near 1 GB. (The hadoop distcp operation typically leaves some directories behind, with names matching _distcp_logs_*, that you can delete from the destination directory afterward.) See the Hadoop DistCP Guide for details.

How Parquet Data Files Are Organized

Although Parquet is a column-oriented file format, do not expect to find one data file for each column. Parquet keeps all the data for a row within the same data file, to ensure that the columns for a row are always available on the same node for processing. What Parquet does is to set an HDFS block size and a maximum data file size of 1 GB, to ensure that I/O and network transfer requests apply to large batches of data.

Within that gigabyte of space, the data for a set of rows is rearranged so that all the values from the first column are organized in one contiguous block, then all the values from the second column, and so on. Putting the values from the same column next to each other lets Impala use effective compression techniques on the values in that column.

  Note:

The Parquet data files have an HDFS block size of 1 GB, the same as the maximum Parquet data file size, to ensure that each data file is represented by a single HDFS block, and the entire file can be processed on a single node without requiring any remote reads. If the block size is reset to a lower value during a file copy, you will see lower performance for queries involving those files, and the PROFILE statement will reveal that some I/O is being done suboptimally, through remote reads. See Example of Copying Parquet Data Files for an example showing how to preserve the block size when copying Parquet data files.

When Impala retrieves or tests the data for a particular column, it opens all the data files, but only reads the portion of each file where the values for that column are stored consecutively. If other columns are named in the SELECT list or WHERE clauses, the data for all columns in the same row is available within that same data file.

If an INSERT statement brings in less than 1 GB of data, the resulting data file is smaller than ideal. Thus, if you do split up an ETL job to use multiple INSERT statements, try to keep the volume of data for each INSERT statement to approximately 1 GB, or a multiple of 1 GB.

RLE and Dictionary Encoding for Parquet Data Files

Parquet uses some automatic compression techniques, such as run-length encoding (RLE) and dictionary encoding, based on analysis of the actual data values. Once the data values are encoded in a compact form, the encoded data can optionally be further compressed using a compression algorithm. Parquet data files created by Impala can use Snappy, GZip, or no compression; the Parquet spec also allows LZO compression, but currently Impala does not support LZO-compressed Parquet files.

RLE and dictionary encoding are compression techniques that Impala applies automatically to groups of Parquet data values, in addition to any Snappy or GZip compression applied to the entire data files. These automatic optimizations can save you time and planning that are normally needed for a traditional data warehouse. For example, dictionary encoding reduces the need to create numeric IDs as abbreviations for longer string values.

Run-length encoding condenses sequences of repeated data values. For example, if many consecutive rows all contain the same value for a country code, those repeating values can be represented by the value followed by a count of how many times it appears consecutively.

Dictionary encoding takes the different values present in a column, and represents each one in compact 2-byte form rather than the original value, which could be several bytes. (Additional compression is applied to the compacted values, for extra space savings.) This type of encoding applies when the number of different values for a column is less than 2**16 (16,384). It does not apply to columns of data type BOOLEAN, which are already very short. TIMESTAMP columns sometimes have a unique value for each row, in which case they can quickly exceed the 2**16 limit on distinct values. The 2**16 limit on different values within a column is reset for each data file, so if several different data files each contained 10,000 different city names, the city name column in each data file could still be condensed using dictionary encoding.

Compacting Data Files for Parquet Tables

If you reuse existing table structures or ETL processes for Parquet tables, you might encounter a "many small files" situation, which is suboptimal for query efficiency. For example, statements like these might produce inefficiently organized data files:

-- In an N-node cluster, each node produces a data file
-- for the INSERT operation. If you have less than
-- N GB of data to copy, some files are likely to be
-- much smaller than the 1 GB block size.
insert into parquet_table select * from text_table;

-- Even if this operation involves an overall large amount of data,
-- when split up by year/month/day, each partition might only
-- receive a small amount of data. Then the data files for
-- the partition might be divided between the N nodes in the cluster.
-- A multi-gigabyte copy operation might produce files of only
-- a few MB each.
insert into partitioned_parquet_table partition (year, month, day)
  select year, month, day, url, referer, user_agent, http_code, response_time
  from web_stats;

Here are techniques to help you produce large data files in Parquet INSERT operations, and to compact existing too-small data files:

  • When inserting into a partitioned Parquet table, use statically partitioned INSERT statements where the partition key values are specified as constant values. Ideally, use a separate INSERT statement for each partition.

  • You might set the NUM_NODES option to 1 briefly, during INSERT or CREATE TABLE AS SELECT statements. Normally, those statements produce one or more data files per data node. If the write operation involves small amounts of data, a Parquet table, and/or a partitioned table, the default behavior could produce many small files when intuitively you might expect only a single output file. SET NUM_NODES=1 turns off the "distributed" aspect of the write operation, making it more likely to produce only one or a few data files.

  • Be prepared to reduce the number of partition key columns from what you are used to with traditional analytic database systems.

  • Do not expect Impala-written Parquet files to fill up the entire Parquet block size (1 GB by default). Impala estimates on the conservative side when figuring out how much data to write to each Parquet file. Typically, 1 GB of uncompressed data in memory is reduced down to much less than 1 GB on disk by the compression and encoding techniques in the Parquet file format. Impala reserves 1 GB of memory to buffer the data before writing, but the actual data file might be smaller, in the hundreds of megabytes. The final data file size varies depending on the compressibility of the data. Therefore, it is not an indication of a problem if 1 GB of text data is turned into 2 Parquet data files, each less than 1 GB.

  • If you accidentally end up with a table with many small data files, consider using one or more of the preceding techniques and copying all the data into a new Parquet table, either through CREATE TABLE AS SELECT or INSERT ... SELECT statements.

    To avoid rewriting queries to change table names, you can adopt a convention of always running important queries against a view. Changing the view definition immediately switches any subsequent queries to use the new underlying tables:

    create view production_table as select * from table_with_many_small_files;
    -- CTAS or INSERT...SELECT all the data into a more efficient layout...
    alter view production_table as select * from table_with_few_big_files;
    select * from production_table where c1 = 100 and c2 < 50 and ...;
    

Schema Evolution for Parquet Tables

Schema evolution refers to using the statement ALTER TABLE ... REPLACE COLUMNS to change the names, data type, or number of columns in a table. You can perform schema evolution for Parquet tables as follows:

  • The Impala ALTER TABLE statement never changes any data files in the tables. From the Impala side, schema evolution involves interpreting the same data files in terms of a new table definition. Some types of schema changes make sense and are represented correctly. Other types of changes cannot be represented in a sensible way, and produce special result values or conversion errors during queries.

  • The INSERT statement always creates data using the latest table definition. You might end up with data files with different numbers of columns or internal data representations if you do a sequence of INSERT and ALTER TABLE ... REPLACE COLUMNS statements.

  • If you use ALTER TABLE ... REPLACE COLUMNS to define additional columns at the end, when the original data files are used in a query, these final columns are considered to be all NULL values.

  • If you use ALTER TABLE ... REPLACE COLUMNS to define fewer columns than before, when the original data files are used in a query, the unused columns still present in the data file are ignored.

  • Parquet represents the TINYINT, SMALLINT, and INT types the same internally, all stored in 32-bit integers.

    • That means it is easy to promote a TINYINT column to SMALLINT or INT, or a SMALLINT column to INT. The numbers are represented exactly the same in the data file, and the columns being promoted would not contain any out-of-range values.
    • If you change any of these column types to a smaller type, any values that are out-of-range for the new type are returned incorrectly, typically as negative numbers.

    • You cannot change a TINYINT, SMALLINT, or INT column to BIGINT, or the other way around. Although the ALTER TABLE succeeds, any attempt to query those columns results in conversion errors.

    • Any other type conversion for columns produces a conversion error during queries. For example, INT to STRING, FLOAT to DOUBLE, TIMESTAMP to STRING, DECIMAL(9,0) to DECIMAL(5,2), and so on.