ORDER BY Clause
The familiar ORDER BY clause of a SELECT statement sorts the result set based on the values from one or more columns.
For distributed queries, this is a relatively expensive operation, because the entire result set must be produced and transferred to one node before the sorting can happen. This can require more memory capacity than a query without ORDER BY. Even if the query takes approximately the same time to finish with or without the ORDER BY clause, subjectively it can appear slower because no results are available until all processing is finished, rather than results coming back gradually as rows matching the WHERE clause are found. Therefore, if you only need the first N results from the sorted result set, also include the LIMIT clause, which reduces network overhead and the memory requirement on the coordinator node.
In Impala 1.4.0 and higher, the LIMIT clause is now optional (rather than required) for queries that use the ORDER BY clause. Impala automatically uses a temporary disk work area to perform the sort if the sort operation would otherwise exceed the Impala memory limit for a particular data node.
The full syntax for the ORDER BY clause is:
ORDER BY col1 [, col2 ...] [ASC | DESC] [NULLS FIRST | NULLS LAST]
The default sort order (the same as using the ASC keyword) puts the smallest values at the start of the result set, and the largest values at the end. Specifying the DESC keyword reverses that order.
See NULL for details about how NULL values are positioned in the sorted result set, and how to use the NULLS FIRST and NULLS LAST clauses. (The sort position for NULL values in ORDER BY ... DESC queries is changed in Impala 1.2.1 and higher to be more standards-compliant, and the NULLS FIRST and NULLS LAST keywords are new in Impala 1.2.1.)
Prior to Impala 1.4.0, Impala required any query including an ORDER BY clause to also use a LIMIT clause. In Impala 1.4.0 and higher, the LIMIT clause is optional for ORDER BY queries. In cases where sorting a huge result set requires enough memory to exceed the Impala memory limit for a particular node, Impala automatically uses a temporary disk work area to perform the sort operation.
Although the LIMIT clause is now optional on ORDER BY queries, if your query only needs some number of rows that you can predict in advance, use the LIMIT clause to reduce unnecessary processing. For example, if the query has a clause LIMIT 10, each data node sorts its portion of the relevant result set and only returns 10 rows to the coordinator node. The coordinator node picks the 10 highest or lowest row values out of this small intermediate result set.
If an ORDER BY clause is applied to an early phase of query processing, such as a subquery or a view definition, Impala ignores the ORDER BY clause. To get ordered results from a subquery or view, apply an ORDER BY clause to the outermost or final SELECT level.
ORDER BY is often used in combination with LIMIT to perform
SELECT user_id as "Top 10 Visitors", SUM(page_views) FROM web_stats GROUP BY page_views, user_id ORDER BY SUM(page_views) DESC LIMIT 10;
ORDER BY is sometimes used in combination with OFFSET and LIMIT to paginate query results, although it is relatively inefficient to issue multiple queries like this against the large tables typically used with Impala:
SELECT page_title as "Page 1 of search results", page_url FROM search_content WHERE LOWER(page_title) LIKE '%game%') ORDER BY page_title LIMIT 10 OFFSET 0; SELECT page_title as "Page 2 of search results", page_url FROM search_content WHERE LOWER(page_title) LIKE '%game%') ORDER BY page_title LIMIT 10 OFFSET 10; SELECT page_title as "Page 3 of search results", page_url FROM search_content WHERE LOWER(page_title) LIKE '%game%') ORDER BY page_title LIMIT 10 OFFSET 20;
Impala sorts the intermediate results of an ORDER BY clause in memory whenever practical. In a cluster of N data nodes, each node sorts roughly 1/Nth of the result set, the exact proportion varying depending on how the data matching the query is distributed in HDFS.
If the size of the sorted intermediate result set on any data node would cause the query to exceed the Impala
memory limit, Impala sorts as much as practical in memory, then writes partially sorted data to disk. (This
technique is known in industry terminology as
This external sort technique is used as appropriate on each data node (possibly including the coordinator node) to sort the portion of the result set that is processed on that node. When the sorted intermediate results are sent back to the coordinator node to produce the final result set, the coordinator node uses a merge sort technique to produce a final sorted result set without using any extra resources on the coordinator node.
Configuration for disk usage:
By default, intermediate files used during large sort operations are stored in the directory
/tmp/impala-scratch. These files are removed when the sort operation finishes. (Multiple
concurrent queries can perform ORDER BY queries that use the external sort technique, without any
name conflicts for these temporary files.)
You can specify a different location by starting the impalad daemon with the
--scratch_dirs="path_to_directory" configuration option. The scratch directory
must be on the local filesystem, not in HDFS. You might specify different directory paths for different hosts,
depending on the capacity and speed of the available storage devices.
Impala will not start if it cannot create or read and write files in the
Sorting considerations: Although you can specify an ORDER BY clause in an INSERT ... SELECT statement, any ORDER BY clause is ignored and the results are not necessarily sorted. An INSERT ... SELECT operation potentially creates many different data files, prepared on different data nodes, and therefore the notion of the data being stored in sorted order is impractical.
[localhost:21000] > create table unsorted (x bigint); [localhost:21000] > insert into unsorted values (1), (9), (3), (7), (5), (8), (4), (6), (2); [localhost:21000] > create view sorted_view as select x from unsorted order by x; [localhost:21000] > select x from sorted_view; -- ORDER BY clause in view has no effect. +---+ | x | +---+ | 1 | | 9 | | 3 | | 7 | | 5 | | 8 | | 4 | | 6 | | 2 | +---+ [localhost:21000] > select x from sorted_view order by x; -- View query requires ORDER BY at outermost level. +---+ | x | +---+ | 1 | | 2 | | 3 | | 4 | | 5 | | 6 | | 7 | | 8 | | 9 | +---+ [localhost:21000] > create view top_3_view as select x from unsorted order by x limit 3; [localhost:21000] > select x from top_3_view; -- ORDER BY and LIMIT together in view definition are preserved. +---+ | x | +---+ | 1 | | 2 | | 3 | +---+
With the lifting of the requirement to include a LIMIT clause in every ORDER BY query (in Impala 1.4 and higher):
Now the use of scratch disk space raises the possibility of an
"out of disk space "error on a particular data node, as opposed to the previous possibility of an "out of memory "error. Make sure to keep at least 1 GB free on the filesystem used for temporary sorting work.
In Impala 1.2.1 and higher, all NULL values come at the end of the result set for ORDER BY ... ASC queries, and at the beginning of the result set for ORDER BY ... DESC queries. In effect, NULL is considered greater than all other values for sorting purposes. The original Impala behavior always put NULL values at the end, even for ORDER BY ... DESC queries. The new behavior in Impala 1.2.1 makes Impala more compatible with other popular database systems. In Impala 1.2.1 and higher, you can override or specify the sorting behavior for NULL by adding the clause NULLS FIRST or NULLS LAST at the end of the ORDER BY clause.
See SELECT Statement for further examples of queries with the ORDER BY clause. For information about the query options you can set to fine-tune the behavior of the ORDER BY clause and avoid changing your SQL to add an explicit LIMIT clause, see DEFAULT_ORDER_BY_LIMIT and ABORT_ON_DEFAULT_LIMIT_EXCEEDED.